If thinking about segmentation, make sure you talk to someone who has actually done a few different types!
There’s another article on consumer segmentation this week that seems to be getting a lot of buzz on twitter etc. You can read the article here in AdAge CMO Strategy section. Michael Fassnacht argues about the weakness of segmentation.
I disagreed with this article and will respond briefly here because I think segmentation studies are the most important type of research a company can engage in. If your company does only one piece of research this year, it should be customer segmentation to find out where to spend precious marketing dollars, and where not to.
First, segments don’t have to be static, in fact I believe they should be dynamic. Part of the deliverable/output should be scoring algorithm which can be applied at any time, and this one customer can fall into a different segment if their variables on file change.
Naturally, no segmentation has an indefinite shelf life. And thought should be given to updating segmentation every 3-5 years or when new better data sources become available, or when marketing tools change.
The second argument of belonging to more than one segment, is also rather weak. It’s almost irrelevant in most cases. If your segmentation schema is good, whether you fall into segment 1 or segment 2, the treatment will and should likely be the same, if those two segments are similar. Again it depends on product category etc. but this really should not be an issue either. Also, segment algorithm I mentioned above should give you a score of likeliness to belong in each segment. Marketers can then decide if extending a message intended for segment 1 customers, to customers who are second most likely to be in segment 1 should also get that message/offer.
Finally, the comment about 1-1 segmentation is a nice idea, but in practicality, we are a long way from implementing that in a meaningful way that would save marketers from wasting dollars.
It takes a bit of background in statistics and the segmentation methods available, as well as experience conducting a few different types of segmentations in different industries before you can discuss this topic intelligently. I’m sure that is not the case in the article. Actually, there are few true segmentation experts in our industry. If you need to do a segmentation, ask your consultant how many they have done, and what types of different methods they are familiar with.
Tom


















































4 responses so far ↓
1 Steve Rubel // Apr 16, 2009 at 8:43 pm
Not my piece but thanks!
2 Tom H C Anderson // Apr 16, 2009 at 8:59 pm
Sorry, not sure how that happened, will fix
3 Brandon Watts // Apr 20, 2009 at 10:09 pm
Agree with your points. While the article makes some valid point regarding weaknesses of segmentation studies that are poorly designed or executed, the article generally misses the point. All consumers have different wants, needs, and attitudes towards products they use in various categories and therefore “where different hats”, but this would be captured in any reasonable segmentation.
I would argue that applying a uniform message to your entire consumer base or simply guessing is more risky and possibly more costly than investing in a well-designed segmentation. Segmentation, just like so many other things including consumer panels, is not dead. Both of these remain viable, valuable tools that are merely complemented by new techniques and research platforms.
4 Sarmus // Apr 21, 2009 at 7:20 am
“It takes a bit of background in statistics and the segmentation methods available, as well as experience conducting a few different types of segmentations in different industries before you can discuss this topic intelligently. I’m sure that is not the case in the article. Actually, there are few true segmentation experts in our industry” - completely agree with it
Leave a Comment