Tom H. C. Anderson - Next Gen Market Research™2nd inning little big league 2 sitemap
2011 porn literotica sitemap
100 great breads sitemap
2011 attack on titan sitemap
a la sombra del templo sitemap
30 days to masterful nlp anchoring by michael sitemap
1 click dvd to vcd sitemap
459 photos of bollywood and south indian actress photos thrg b369 sitemap
2011 game over by winter ramos sitemap
a mango shaped space sitemap
across the lines sitemap
30 cityscapes smartphone wallpapers set 1 sitemap
128x160 bounce tales jar sitemap
2011 acemoney lite for mac os x serial sitemap
1 click direction 1 2 9 179 kb sitemap
2011 sahne frost ian murphy sitemap
1992 damage 3gp mp4 full movie sitemap
abg ngentot 3gp sitemap
1985 volunteers sitemap
2011 ti penso raramente biagio antonacci sitemap
40 sheet music bestsellers hollywood hits piano solos pianovocalguitar sitemap
a is for alibi sitemap
3 day to kill sitemap
abbyy finereader pro version 12 multilingual crack sitemap
6 chambers 1 bullet sitemap
2011 only lovers left alive 2013 webrip x264 ac3titan sitemap
a practical manual of the compass sitemap
2011 animal porno zoofilia sitemap
10musume 061413 01 rio miyata jav uncensored sitemap
2011 adobe illustrator cs5 serial generator sitemap
720p dual audio hindi sitemap
aasai makan pdf sitemap
acrobat 7 professional key generator sitemap
21st century leisure current issues sitemap
640 554 download pdf sitemap
135000 plr article collection 2008 2009 rar sitemap
2011 symphobia 2 sitemap
7 khoon maaf 2011 dvdrip xvid 1cdrip dustorrents sitemap
240x320 mobile games jar sitemap
a bullet for the general quin sabe 1966 sitemap
2011 baba bulleh shah sitemap
19 kacha kach mare ho kamriya bhojpuri dj mix high sitemap
aby 014 kirara asuka thaimovie3g 8 mp4 sitemap
acronis 2013 incl crack sitemap
10musume javpop sitemap
2011 the banana splits the beagles 1994 sitemap
38 dictionnaire sitemap
2011 lady of the knight jackie ivie sitemap
abu dhabi font sitemap
8 apellidos vascos added by request sitemap
ace hood call me mp3 sitemap
3 on a bed bengali full movie watch online free sitemap
ableton live lite 6 m audio enhanced edition keygen sitemap
1 jacqlien celosse bapaku yang baik sitemap
academic conversations classroom talk that fosters critical thinking and content understanding sitemap
1979 smashing pumpkins sitemap
3gp sex video free download naughty america hentai sitemap
a family affair mary campisi sitemap
2011 flight of the butterflies sitemap
3 on a bed bengali full movie torrent sitemap

More Than Market Research - Gain The Information Advantage

Tom H. C. Anderson - Next Gen Market Research™ header image 6

Text Analysis Explains Why Obama Wins

October 23rd, 2012 · 1 Comment

Scientific Text Analysis of 2012 Debates Explains why Obama’s Style May have Out-performed Romney’s

Following up on this weekend’s analysis of the first two presidential debates we added yesterday’s final debate to the analysis. General consensus among viewers and pundits alike seems to be that Romney performed better than expected in the first debate, and Obama performed better in the final two debates. Here’s why this may be:

Obama’s Style More Persuasive

Obama’s success may in no small part be due to his speech style which combines words emphasizing certainty, thinking, and causation, compared to Romney’s directness and more perceptual style. In other words, Obama is far more likely than Romney to use words related to thinking (cognition) such as “I know” or “I understand” rather than Romney’s more perceptual words “I feel” or “I see”. Perceptive words are often considered less scientific and more subjective than thinking words. Obama’s speech is also more likely to contain causation, in other words he is more likely to back statements up as indicated by increased use of terms like “effect”, “hence”, “because” or “results”.

Additionally, Obama’s higher certainty (terms like “never”, “always”, “sure” and “definitely”), can provide stronger and more convincing arguments and can help paint the speaker as an expert.

In regard to sentiment, as discussed in yesterday’s post, throughout the debates while both candidates seemed to use equal amounts of positive emotion in their speech, understandably perhaps, Romney was more likely to also use negative emotion (especially sadness in the first debate). This can serve as an implicit way of attacking your opponent.

However, Obama’s insistence on the use of more collectivist language (i.e. use of “we” rather than individualist “I”), seemed to serve him well in countering these attacks. While it was not always clear whether Obama’s “we” referred to himself, his team or the nation as a whole, speaking in this ‘voice of the nation’ style undoubtedly served him well and together with the more sophisticated (longer words) and thinking words in his speech, may have helped paint him as a responsible, more certain and expert steward of our nation.

Read more on content analysis of the debates here.

@TomHCAnderson
@Odintext

[NOTE: Text analytics can be used to investigate some of the reasons why Obama seemed to perform better than Romney. Explaining the success of Obama or Romney in debates they are considered to have won is difficult because neither candidate changed style much across the debates. In a few instances they switched style slightly from debate to debate, but more often their style categories were consistent across all three debates (including those lost). This emphasizes the fact that language use is something inherent to speakers and is quite subconscious. Rather than being a strategic choice, differences in style between debates may be a result from their reaction to debate-specific circumstances (questions from the moderator, behavior of the other candidate, etc.). Therefore this analysis focuses on Obama's and Romney's styles across all three debates.

The above speech characteristics are not the only indicative attributes enabling a candidate to win. However, since most likely a win is a combination of several language characteristics appearing in some or all debates (plus other non-linguistic issues including facial expressions, candidate's general appeal to the public, their political affiliation and issue position) we can assume that some of these categories played a role in contributing to the success in the debates.]

[Post to Twitter] 

Tags: Anderson Analytics · Odin Text · OdinText · Sentiment · Sentiment Analysis · Text Analytics · Uncategorized · text mining · tomhcanderson

1 response so far ↓

  • 1 Tom H C Anderson // Oct 31, 2012 at 10:21 am

    While at OdinText we typically analyze thousands or even millions of comments from surveys or call center logs, content analysis can be used to analyze even small unstructured data sets like debate transcripts.
    The point of this fun non-partisan analysis of the debates was not to predict the winner of the election or even the debates, rather previous research in the area of content analysis proves that people prefer speakers who are similar to themselves. Further analysis could compare how Democrat, Republican or Independent voters speak to better understand which candidate’s style appeals to them.

Leave a Comment